RE: New purchase -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: New purchase
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:19:20 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

You know, it may have been V5R1 instead of 7.1. There were a lot of people who stayed at V4R5 way too long. Probably because it was the last version which could compile down to CISC boxes. Which also makes sense as to V5R1 being the most likely over 7.1 in enhancing the observability retention.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: New purchase , Mark Waterbury
Re: New purchase , Mark Waterbury

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.