Re: QTEMP position in library list -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: QTEMP position in library list
From: Peter Dow <petercdow@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:47:28 -0700
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Now there's a thought. Why have QTEMP in the library list at all except for testing? If you need a file or object in QTEMP for production, qualify any reference to it.

On 7/1/2022 12:37 PM, Rob Berendt wrote:

Honestly I would think that for testing issues you can change that on the fly in an interactive job, or use a test job description with an alternative library list.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: QTEMP position in library list , Brad Stone
Re: QTEMP position in library list , Vern Hamberg

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.