Re: 7.6 and SDA ? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: 7.6 and SDA ?
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 13:57:45 +0100
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello Rob,

Am 17.02.2026 um 13:19 schrieb Rob Berendt <robertowenberendt@xxxxxxxxx>:

"need" is not a word open to opinion.

I have not used the word "need" anywhere in my reply.

Is SEU "needed" to edit a CL program in a crisis situation? If you were tasked in such a situation to work on a system without SEU would you reply to IBM that you couldn't do it? Or would you find a way?

Of course I would find a way. But why do you suddenly add a crisis situation scenario? My sole point was to make you aware that "not using SEU" isn't an option for everyone, for various reasons, which might even appear minor to you.

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: 7.6 and SDA ? , Jim Oberholtzer
Re: 7.6 and SDA ? , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.