The funny thing is that as near as I can tell the costs associated with the
downgrade are slapped on by the hardware vendor and not MS. When the whole
downgrade issue was first raised it was noted that the Vista licenses that
allow for downgrading simply allow it. It's up to the consumer to acquire
XP install media and it appears the OEMs are charging.

I'd also not expect the suit to get very far as the machines were capable of
running Vista. Maybe not running it "well" or "optimally" but they could
run it.

And I do run Vista at home and work. It's fine on reasonably equipped
modern hardware. It even has better driver support than XP, as evidenced by
not requiring a 400+MB download from HP to manage my multifunction
print/scan/FAX/copy machine.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:24 PM, sjl <sjl_abc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I don't, because I don't have and will _never_ have a PC running Vista...


http://weblog.infoworld.com/robertxcringely/archives/2009/02/microsoft_downg.html?source=NLC-NOTES&cgd=2009-02-23

- sjl



--
This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech) mailing list
To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech
or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.