I won't lie, to me an indicator is a variable, and I have no need to have them separated out because of their data type. I would rather see them all in one location (less obfuscation), but it's not really that important to me.
The filter Mark linked to is much more important to me.
And to plug a less related but still relevant RFE on the outline (filtering by ref/unref):
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=12353
-Kurt
-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmund Reinhardt
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:36 AM
To: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WDSCI-L] To be under Indicators or not to be
Ken's question about where in the Outline view to find named indicators has stirred things up a bit.
We would like to know if there is a strong preference to move Named indicators under the Fields heading so that all fields can be found in one place and only predefined indicator usage being shown under the Indicators heading.
On the other hand would anyone be upset about not finding the Named indicators under the Indicators heading any more?
IBM is listening.
Regards,
Edmund (E.H.) Reinhardt
COBOL IDE on AIX, DDS, WebFacing, System i Application Development, Rational Developer for Power
2D barcode - Phone: 1-905-413-3125 | Phone: 1-905-854-6195 IBM
encoded with E-mail: edmund.reinhardt@xxxxxxxxxx
contact AIX COBOL: 8200 Warden Ave
information www.youtube.com/user/IBMRational#g/c/62DF24D5BCD43501 Markham, ON L6G 1C7
"In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of Canada
God in Christ Jesus concerning you." - 1
Thessalonians 5:18
midrange.com
