I just briefly scanned the redbook and haven't tested DEFLATE myself, but it appeared to me that the compression worked with both static and dynamic content, but seemed to be filtered according to the content-type header in the response. Maybe the content-type of your net.data output didn't match the filter criteria. Or maybe the time required to compress the output wasn't offset sufficiently by gains from reducing the file size. What size was the output?
----- Original Message ----
From: Mike Cunningham <mcunning@xxxxxxx>
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:59:01 PM
Subject: Re: [WEB400] DEFLATE (was Faster HTML Output.)
Does anyone know if DEFLATE does anything to dynamic HTML that is
returned? Form the way the setup reads it in some ways sounds like it would
only work on static files. I turned it on but it did not appear to
make any difference on a large page returned from net.data
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
