Re: JavaFX viability was->Re: Pete's web5250 -- WEB400

Subject: Re: JavaFX viability was->Re: Pete's web5250
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:14:11 +0100
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Aaron Bartell skrev:

the user/business needs. Most SOA and XML is a band-aid for the lack of insight required to get your core business processes on a single platform - just calling it like I see it. The first adopters of internal

Is it at all possible always to get your core business on a single platform?

I know that SOA is just yet another remote procedure call, and that XML allows data to be "suspended" and moved around, but in my world stuff tends to live on islands around the people who use it (otherwise you introduce Network access to the number of things that can go wrong for the user) and then it is impossible to merge them.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: JavaFX viability was->Re: Pete's web5250 , Aaron Bartell

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.