I think if it was a problem he could rewrite the required bits without
too much effort. I think he did it this way so that existing CGIDEV2
apps could be extended to use the new functionality - much the same as
Renaissance have done with their stuff.
I suspect IBM would never bother going after anyone - the major reason
for the copyright notices has to do with not wanting to accept
responsibility for others modifications etc. There are other reasons
but I just don't think anyone there cares enough about it or they'd
have done more with the poor little orphan than they have. Doesn't
Giovanni distribute a version that is different from the iBM one?
Jon Paris
www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:00 PM, web400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
My biggest question is whether IBM will go along with them
distributing CGIDEV2 with powerExt? On one hand IBM provides a free
license to CGIDEV2, and source. But maintains their exclusive
copyright statements in source headers on the other.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.