Does anyone believe in the traditional approach to growing a business on a
fair and trustworthy quid pro quo basis?

I wanted to note that I doubt any open source developers are doing it for
free, and it is, in fact, done for profit by their own choice. Many open
source developers are full-time employees of a company that is paying them
to contribute to open source because it meets the business agenda of the
company.

A fair amount of open source is quid pro quo - there is just a different
marketing approach to making the money. I like to think of open source as
an excellent loss leader**. This is evident in projects like SugarCRM.
When a product is the only act in town they can ask what they want for
software and not give away source, but that just isn't as much of a reality
anymore.

**http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/loss+leader

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
http://mowyourlawn.com/blog/

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.