Re: Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2? -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2?
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen
If I understand Aaron correctly, the problem is the HTTP server not
servicing requests fast enough, not necessarily that there are too few
threads. The behaviour described fits with the TCP/IP layer filling up.

I subscribed the behavior to the HTTP server rejecting connections, probably due
to limiting the number of threads, and at the same time enabling persistent
connections. If you only enable 10 connections, and hold on to each, somebody
is bound to get rejected.

I've done quite a bit of stress testing, and never encountered a rejected
connection at the i/OS level; only at the HTTP server level.

-Nathan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2? , Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.