Re: IBM i in the cloud (was social media) -- WEB400

Subject: Re: IBM i in the cloud (was social media)
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:51:17 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Bryce Martin wrote:

And if HTTPS is sufficient then why would you consider it less secure than
SOAP?

More to the point ... why is anyone comparing HTTPS & SOAP at all? They are apples & oranges.

HTTPS is a security protocol.

SOAP is a data protocol.

An application might use HTTPS (SSL to be more precise) to securely issue a SOAP request, but that's the extent of it.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: IBM i in the cloud (was social media) , joepluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.