Re: Why the IBM i *might* not be a good web server -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Why the IBM i *might* not be a good web server
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <thunderaxiom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:35:16 +0100
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

100% just means "no idle cycles".

I frequently max out our box with some batch Java monstrosities. I've
noticed that nobody appears to notice :)

-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Kevin Turner
Sent: 11. december 2010 22:08
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Why the IBM i *might* not be a good web server

When it says 100% it must be lying :-)

On 11 Dec 2010, at 20:46, "Mike Wills" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As a side story to that. One time I was running an upgrade of some vendor

software. The system was pegged at 100% for over 12 hours while other people
where still using the system for a portion of that time. While it was
slower, they could still work. Lets see any other server be able to do
that... THAT is why I like this system.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.