Sorry Mark - but I have to disagree.
The current storage engine was the first phase. There were on-going discussions within IBM months ago about how to enable it for existing tables (DB2 or DDS) and it was certainly the goal of at least one Rochester developer to make that happen. The storage engine is an IBM development - not MySQL. So it will depend on IBM as to whether it continues and is enhanced.
The withdrawal of support by Oracle may make iBM think twice about extending the product - but that's about it.
Many folks have already enabled existing databases. It is not exactly rocket science.
Jon Paris
www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
On Dec 18, 2010, at 11:13 PM, web400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The DB2 engine on i was never more than a half baked attempt to link MySql to DB2.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.