I tend to agree with Mark. These conversations do belong here. They do
relate to IBM i, and are useful to IBM i developers who should be
considering these technologies for new applications.
Of course, the discussions may also be useful to people on other
platforms, too. For this reason, the original posters such as Kelly
might wish to cross-post them to other forums where they would be more
visible to people across other platforms and would allow them to also
give their input.
But that does not (and should not) preclude also having the conversation
here. I don't think it's right to restrict WEB400 solely to back-end
solutions.
The things that Kelly and others have been discussing are HIGHLY
relevant to the questions going through the minds of IBM i developers
who are looking to implement modern front-ends.
On 7/13/2015 6:21 AM, Mark Murphy/STAR BASE Consulting Inc. wrote:
Seems to me that if IBM i is being used to serve these applications,
this is the correct place to discuss them.
[SNIP]
Besides, if we kick out these discussions we are intentionally
diminishing the IBM i community.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.