Re: The responsive web site debate -- WEB400

Subject: Re: The responsive web site debate
From: Aaron Bartell <aaronbartell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:40:15 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

This thread has talked about various frameworks and comparing them. Nobody
wants to head down a path that isn't right for them and few have the luxury
of taking each approach for a test drive.

That's where todomvc.com comes into play - a great way to get an
introductory feel for how the popular Javascript frameworks compare to each
other when accomplishing the EXACT same task. Check it out: todomvc.com

Aaron Bartell

litmis.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: The responsive web site debate , Joe W Holt
Re: The responsive web site debate , Nathan Andelin
Re: The responsive web site debate , Pete Helgren

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.