Re: Hosting a Large Number of Node Apps on the IBM i -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Hosting a Large Number of Node Apps on the IBM i
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:45:58 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I am sure Kelly is talking about the top level routing to the app and how
to handle that as opposed to the question of internal routing to "screens"
within the app.

Kelly is asking about a mix of both types of routing - External routing
within a reverse-proxy / load-balancer as well as internal routing within
Node's own HTTP service.

How would one configure both so that a broadly-scoped system performs well,
scales well, you don't introduce too many HTTP restarts?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Hosting a Large Number of Node Apps on the IBM i , Kelly Cookson
Re: Hosting a Large Number of Node Apps on the IBM i , Henrik Rützou

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.