Yes, interpreted is slower than compiled. But that's what node is all about. It not only allows JavaScript to run on servers, it compiles to machine language on servers to run really fast. Performance is also improved by making good use the event-loop architecture (passing time consuming functions to worker threads), spawning child processes, and using the cluster functionality for load balancing.

I agree it's not easy to benchmark these things-on any system. But that kind of leaves me with nothing to go on but the general claims I see online from other systems. Which is that node runs faster than CGI. If CGI on the IBM i is much better than CGI on other systems, then it might be worth trying to benchmark these things; otherwise, it's just a matter of opinion and guesses whether node or CGI performs better (or equally well) on IBM i.

Thanks,

Kelly Cookson
IT Project Leader
Dot Foods, Inc.
217-773-4486 ext. 12676
www.dotfoods.com<http://www.dotfoods.com>


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.