That's something IBM will have to answer.. or maybe Aaron.

But if the ARE now compiling, that tells you interpreted must have had some
drawbacks. Everything comes full circle.. we went from interpreted (BASIC)
to compiled (RPG, et all) , then to interpreted again and now compiled all
in a span of my lifetime...

If there was a way to truly load test thousands of concurrent requests on
either I'd be in for that, but alas, it's not that easy.



On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Kelly Cookson <KCookson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Hard to believe that a technology that is interpreted at its heart would
outperform compiled programs.

JavaScript is supposed to be compiled to machine language by the V8 engine
in Node.JS. Can't run any faster than machine language.

Is this not true for the IBM i?

Thanks,


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.