|
Al, the last half-decade was dismal for computers in general. As to being the best in a decade and why, you'll have to ask Elaine Lennox. Those were her words. And since it was a rebuttal to my generally positive statement, phrases like "I am not finding anything here about the continuing threat from the SCO lawsuit" seems pretty much like looking for a black lining to a silver cloud. My point is that despite all the naysayers, the box is doing quite well, thank you. And frankly, I think it's time people stopped looking for reasons to shout doom and gloom. Personally, I think the constant negative comments from the iSeries community are far more damaging than IBM's lack of marketing. Joe > From: Al Mac > > No > 1. I was looking for stuff in IBM annual report about stuff I thought was > important, such as iSeries > 2. I was sharing what I found that seemed relevant to this group. > > So if 0.8% growth in revenue is the best year for IBM for iSeries for a > decade, that means it is pretty dismal compared to other areas. It is now > in the black. I guess we need to look at some other years to see how > often it was in the red. > > > Al, are you telling us that IBM is going under? Or are you just looking > > for bad news to share? > > > >Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.