RE: WRKJOBSCDE vs GO JS vs ??? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: WRKJOBSCDE vs GO JS vs ???
From: "Musselman, Paul" <pmusselman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:53:20 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I second the idea about creating multiple JOBDs as needed. Chances are most of your production jobs can run under the same JOBD. At worst you'll need just a handful (ie daily/weekly/monthly/etc.). Avoids all that typing of library names! (:

I've always felt that JOBQs, OUTQs, and JOBDs are 'inexpensive' as far as system resources go, so why not make a bunch?!

Of course, -administering- all of those objects once you've got them can be interesting.

Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.