I think a better use of a 3-part name would be an easier method to
handle multi-member files in SQL on System i.
But I guess we should be thankful for what IBM does deliver to us.
( Yes, every new technology is bound to have it's detractors - Maybe it
is just me, but I expect the real things I use EVERY DAY to become
easier.)

- John V

message: 7
date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:38:13 -0400
from: Charles Wilt
subject: Hooray!!! DB2 for i adds remote & local support in a single
SQL statement!


http://www.mcpressonline.com/database/techtip-easier-db2-for-i-data-tran
sfers-with-new-technology-refresh.html

The latest IBM i Technology Refresh for the 7.1 release lifts this
restriction for INSERT statements to simplify data transfer operations
involving three-part names.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.