Re: Convert Existing IPDS Spool to PDF

[Jim Franz <franz9000@xxxxxxxxx>]

*so I do not know why *IPDS was chosen over *AFPDS*
fyi-there was a time, late 90's early 2000's (V3 or V4) that certain page
requirements required *IPDS instead of *AFPDS (I confirmed this at Common,
IBM print stream specialist ), something like page rotation including
barcodes plus font changes in duplex (tri-fold mailer form with barcode on
diff folds). It still runs, less complex, with *AFPDS now. nntr
Jim Franz

On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 10:38 AM Stephen Coyle <stephenfcoyle@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Thanks everyone for their ideas and input!
>
> The print file in question was created long before my time so I do not
> know why *IPDS was chosen over *AFPDS. I ended up re-creating the PRTF
> as AFPDS and all is now well.
> The existing CPYSPLF with WSCST(*PDF) transformed the file fine.
>
> Thanks again!
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
> Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
> questions.