On Jan 11, 2008 8:43 AM, Chuck Lewis <chuck.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For sure Tom. The big pros are it's something I wouldn't have to mess with
too much (not that I'm averse to that but I am a one man shop) but we have
it internal now (on a Linux appliance) and we have a Windows server we could
use so the initial cost would only be Exchange and the CAL's. Decisions,
decisions :-)

You will need a new, fairly large server. For that number of
mailboxes, DO NOT run Exchange on the same system that is already
doing file & print, unless it is way under utilized and has lots of
free disk space. We also have a separate (small) proxy server outside
the firewall for OWA, so that the email server does not get hit
directly from the outside world.

We have a similar number of users; it takes ~1/2 a person to manage on
an ongoing basis.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.