You will need a new, fairly large server. For that number of
mailboxes, DO NOT run Exchange on the same system that is already
doing file & print, unless it is way under utilized and has lots of
free disk space. We also have a separate (small) proxy server outside
the firewall for OWA, so that the email server does not get hit
directly from the outside world.

We have a similar number of users; it takes ~1/2 a person to manage on
an ongoing basis.


I agree with the advice about running on a dedicated box, but you really
don't need a huge server for 160 users.

I've been running Exchange 2003 for 125 users on a Proliant DL360 G5 with
one dual-core Xeon processor (3.2Ghz) for the past 2 years. We've had no
unscheduled downtime at all. Service packs & hotfixes are the only reason
the machine is ever bounced, and that might account for a total of a few
hours per year, at most.

1/2 a person to manage Exchange on an ongoing basis? There's no way that I
spend even ten hours per year on it. I really have no idea what that person
could possible being spending that much time doing with Exchange.

Regards,

John Taylor







As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.