Walden H. Leverich wrote:
Both XP and Windows 2000 (the latter is the leanest plus it does not have validation issues when you do stuff with your virtual machine).

Windows 2000??? WHY???? Anyone that runs 8+ year old Oss has no right to complain about the OS.
The problem is that Microsoft's draconian licensing doesn't play well in virtual machines, especially when you're changing the configuration. Another place it falls down is training. I'd like to keep a catalog of images that I can load 30 copies for two days and then get rid of. I need to have them loaded and tested months ahead of time. That's hard to do with XP, piece of cake with 2000. And remember, these training stations are Windows machines that already have valid licenses - I just want to run the software in a VM to avoid conflicts.

That's just one more reason I find myself inching ever closer to a non-Windows workstation environment. It's ironic that the primary thing holding me back is the RDi tooling <grin>. But I just installed RDi on a W2K virtual machine - I'll let you know if that's my answer. I may just go Linux and run a VM for RDi.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.