For me, it underscores the fact that open-source licensing is a can of
worms from the start - the perception is generally incongruent with the
reality.

I think that might be throwing the baby out with the bath water. That is
like saying all proprietary software vendors are crooks that don't give real
value for what you are purchasing - it isn't black and white.

I am coming to see that there are freedom issues for the consumer with GPL
v3, but as I understand it the same issue isn't there for licenses like BSD
and MIT and Apache.

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
http://mowyourlawn.com/blog/

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.