Comments in-line Aaron.
Jon Paris
www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
On Apr 19, 2010, at 2:13 PM, web400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I think the various forms of RPG+CGI have been slow to mature in the
open
space (i.e. community support) compared to others, but I do think
there is
adequate support out there at this point (i.e. CGIDEV2 forums,
midrange.comforums, Renaissance forum, Valence forums, RPG forums)
Sorry but compared with PHP or .Net or whatever it is still just a
drop in the ocean. I wish it were otherwise.
Don't get me wrong, there will be challenges with RPG+CGI, but there
will be
less of a environment change, and because of that I think the chance
of long
term viability is much greater because we already know what we like
and
don't like about the RPG+DB2+IBMi environment - PHP is a fairly big
and
unknown world that is still a teenager in enterprise compared to IBM
(the
50yr old).
If enough RPG oriented solutions deal with the stateful vs stateless
issue then I might agree with you. I'd also like to run RPG on my PC
or Linux box or Mac or ... but
And I don't particularly like the notion of all state being maintained
be the browser. Those little buggers are still far too unreliable for
that. FF is pretty stable - but somebody's RAI breaks it at least once
every couple of days forcing me to at least close the tab or often the
whole thing and start over with whatever I was working on.
What have you to say to that o' advocate of the devil! ;-)
To be honest (and I know you know this Aaron) - I really don't care
_what_ people choose as long as they choose something to move their
bottoms to the web before it is too late. There's no perfect solution.
As an example - Henrik has mentioned his tooling several times here -
I've looked at it. It is very powerful and looks well built but -
given that despite having been doing various web apps on and off for
some 15+ years now - I'm still clueless about how 90% of it hangs
together and haven't the time to learn it as there are too many other
options competing for my attention.
I guess I am also a long way from being convinced that we all _need_
the kind of RIA complexity that is being promoted. There are days when
it seems to me that it is just a bunch of boys running around with
their cool toys building stuff that nobody really needs and adding
layers and layers of complexity (and therefore inherent failure) to
the applications.
But then maybe I'm just feeling my age today!
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.