When you mention the "no sql" movement are you talking about some of the OO
databases that are coming out? I hadn't thought of that as being a move
toward integrated (because OO is over hyped as it concerns business logic
coding), but that is what they are going for. Interesting.

Aaron Bartell

On Apr 20, 2010 8:37 AM, <MattLavinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


At one point PHP had an integrated database. Not sure if it was any good,
but I don't think anyone used it so it was removed. Fact is distributed
workloads are so common people (outside the IBM i world) don't even know
this debate exists.

With the "No-SQL" movement and frameworks, I tend to wonder if we aren't
heading back towards integrated databases. To me it seems it is only a
matter of time before someone comes out with the new, modern, open-source
language that puts everything together and claims it is revolutionary.
Sure was...back in 1987.




Criticizing PHP is kind of like throwing your baseball mitt out in
front of a steam roller, ...

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.