When you mention the "no sql" movement are you talking about some of the
OO
databases that are coming out? I hadn't thought of that as being a move
toward integrated (because OO is over hyped as it concerns business logic
coding), but that is what they are going for. Interesting.


To be fair, the current "No SQL" databases are distributed databases that
don't use SQL, but the goal certainly seems to make database access more
friendly to the language calling it.

Honestly, if IBM had a marketing bone in its body I'd be putting up posters
at universities saying, "RPG/DB2 - the original No-SQL combo" all under a
picture of a hamburger shaped as RPG and fries in a red box with a yellow
"DB2" label.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.