| 
 | 
On 4/28/06, Lou Forlini <lforlini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At 2:00 PM -0400 4/28/06, Wilt, Charles wrote:
>But I'd be willing to bet that in most cases, you could find some
>improvements in changing from green screen to GUI.
>
>The ROI might take a while, but eventually it would pay off.
    For my part, I refuse to concede that point unless I see some
serious studies that prove it.  Any papers I've read show the GUI
having a small gain in the initial learning curve, followed by a
measurably lower productivity cap for experienced users.  Surveys
that show "users like it better" don't count.  Neither do surveys
that say "users say they work faster".  They may generate a lot more
activity to end up doing the same amount of work.
If we have had this discussion once we have had it 100 times. If you take a green screen application and build it in a gui with the same fields on the same screens, with buttons instead of F keys, there will be a small bit of improvement. But if you re-engineer the application to use modern UI principles, you will get a dramatic productivity improvement. The chances are good that an existing application can be re-engineered in green screen to be more productive, but the GUI has (in my view) more room for improvements. Have a great weekend. -- Tom Jedrzejewicz tomjedrz@xxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.